| Fiscal support | Tax reductions | Exemptions from corporate income tax |
| Tax deductions | ||
| Corporate tax rate relief | ||
| Tax deferrals | ||
| Tax credits | ||
| Allowances |
Governments have the option to offer fiscal support for OFDI projects by reducing the tax burden on firms investing abroad. The kind of fiscal support a country can offer is dependent on its tax system, especially whether the government taxes companies and their foreign affiliates worldwide, or just in relation to activities in its own territory.
The territorial approach taxes only the income earned within a country, with foreign income exempt from taxes. This assures that corporate earnings abroad are only taxed once, i.e., in the host country, and therefore does not discourage the repatriation of overseas earnings. The territorial approach could already be considered a regulatory HCM, as it foregoes the possibility of taxing foreign subsidiaries of a company from the home country. The territorial approach could therefore be considered more supportive to OFDI than the worldwide approach, with companies investing abroad being advantaged if the foreign tax rate is below that of the home country.
The worldwide approach taxes all income of a company irrespective where in the world it was earned. Taxes would be due when the earnings are repatriated, creating incentives to re-invest earnings in the host or other foreign country, rather than repatriating them. The worldwide approach may lead to double taxation in host and home countries, though double taxation treaties or tax credit systems can be put in place that reduce the tax burden by the amount of tax incurred overseas. In such circumstances, the difference between the host and home country taxes can be levied upon repatriation of earnings should the home country tax rate be higher. The worldwide approach places investors at a competitive disadvantage compared to companies from countries with lower taxes or countries that have adopted the territorial approach. Fiscal HCMs are particularly useful when a country uses the worldwide approach, as they can be applied to the tax levied by the home government on the activities of enterprises and their subsidiaries abroad.
Most advanced economies, except the United States, adopt the territorial approach, while the worldwide approach is quite common among emerging economies (Sauvant et al. 2014).
There are various kinds of fiscal support:
Tax reductions can be offered to companies to exempt specific kinds of income from OFDI activities. These can come in two forms:
- Exemption from corporate income tax in home country taxation, to exempt companies from specified taxes, such as on dividends. Some countries specify conditions for such exemptions, for example a minimum degree of share ownership in a foreign affiliate, or not applying the exemptions to dividends made in foreign tax-haven countries.
- Tax deductions to reduce the tax burden on investors. For example, companies could be allowed to deduct costs or business expenses associated with OFDI from their income.
Corporate tax rate relief can be applied to specified types of companies or investments, and at particular stages of an investment. It normally reduces the tax rate by a specified percentage.
Tax deferral can be granted to specified companies and their investments, especially to defer tax payments on certain types of overseas income. Tax deferral generally occurs when companies are not required to tax foreign income until that income has been repatriated. This provides an incentive for MNEs to move operations to countries with lower taxes and accumulate earnings there.
Tax credits can be offered on specified kinds of expenditures related to an investment, such as investments in desirable activities, for example R&D or capital goods.
Allowances can be made to support specific types of investments or activities related to an investment.
Fiscal measures require alterations of tax laws, which should make their implementation and administration comparatively straightforward and not too costly. It should be kept in mind that fiscal HCMs reduce the tax earnings of countries (Sauvant et al. 2014).
Fiscal HCMs offer governments an opportunity to incentivise and support OFDI activities that promise to yield favourable home-country effects. They can focus on investment phases that are critical to the success of an investment (UNESCAP 2020).
Key insights
- The territorial approach to taxation is fiscally more advantageous to firms than the worldwide approach and can be considered itself a HCM.
- Governments can offer various tax incentives to promote desirable investment activities, including those that promise to generate home-country effects.
- As fiscal HCMs reduce the income from taxation available to the home country government, their benefits in terms of offering support to OFDI and the generation of home-country effects need to be weighed against the costs of lower government revenue.
Interactions
D1) Company characteristics: Fiscal HCMs can support OFDI made by specific types of companies, such as those with a good business track record or companies incorporated in the home country (Sauvant et al. 2014, 86-87).
D2) Industrial sector: Fiscal HCMs can support OFDI undertaken in specific industries, such as natural resources, knowledge-intensive or services sectors.
D3) Investment motivation: Fiscal HCMs can support OFDI undertaken for specific purposes and motivations, such as technology- or resource-seeking.
D5) Entry mode: Fiscal HCMs can support OFDI with specific entry modes, such as M&As.
D6) Investment destination: It is possible to not extend fiscal HCMs to companies investing in countries where they already enjoy preferential tax treatment (e.g., in tax havens).
D10) Targeting home-country effects: Fiscal support can be targeted at the generation of specific home-country effects, especially the repatriation of earnings.
E1) Financial losses: Fiscal HCMs reduce the tax earnings of home countries.
E3) Competitive neutrality: Excessive or inappropriate use of fiscal support HCMs might undermine competitive neutrality.
Available Research Findings
PWC Worldwide Tax Summaries online provides information on corporate and individual taxes worldwide.
Deloitte World Tax Advisor analyses cross-border tax developments faced by MNEs.
Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries – OECD publication.
Sauvant et al. (2014, 76-86) for an analysis of fiscal support measures.
Dittmer (2012) on the territorial vs. worldwide approaches to taxation.
Gresik (2001) on taxation of MNEs.
Barrios et al. (2012) for empirical research on the impact of worldwide taxation on location choice.
Existing Country Practices
The tax information provided here may not be up to date and is sometimes provided for illustrative purposes.
Relevant tax rules in Canada:
Income Tax Act of 1985.
Relevant tax rules in the Republic of Korea:
December 2011 update to tax rules affecting foreign transactions.
Relevant tax rules in Malaysia:
Tax incentive for acquiring a foreign company.
Tax incentive on pre-operational business expenditure.
Relevant tax rules in Singapore:
Tax obligations, exemptions and concessions enjoyed by companies receiving foreign income.
Enterprise Singapore summarises tax incentives available for internationalisation-related activities.
Relevant tax rules in the United States:
The United States tax reform of 2017-18 included measures to encourage MNEs to return funds to the United States.
The Homeland Investment Act (HIA) of 2005 offered tax breaks on the repatriation of investment funds.
The Tax Expenditures Compendium of Background Material on Individual Provisions 2010 provides information on international taxation including tax credits (after page 33).
Resources
PWC Worldwide Tax Summaries online provides information on corporate and individual
taxes worldwide.
Deloitte World Tax Advisor analyses cross-border tax developments faced by MNEs.
Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries – OECD publication.
Sauvant et al. (2014, 76-86) for an analysis of fiscal support measures.
Dittmer (2012) on the territorial vs. worldwide approaches to taxation.
Gresik (2001) on taxation of MNEs.
Barrios et al. (2012) for empirical research on the impact of worldwide taxation on location choice.